When you don’t create things, you become defined by your tastes rather than ability. Your tastes only narrow and exclude people. so create. — Why the Lucky Stiff*
When my husband recited a paraphrased version of this quote to me a couple of months ago, I didn’t think much about it. But, as time passed I found myself turning the words over in my mind with greater and greater frequency. I made a vow to myself that I would never become a person simply defined by my tastes. I think that having opinions and preferences is important, but when asked to describe myself, I don’t want to be stuck saying, “Well, I like Kurt Vonnegut, Downton Abbey, and the Beastie Boys.”
It’s true — I do like all of those things, but that doesn’t say much about me as an individual (surely the 8 million American fans of Downton Abbey will agree with me). My preferences aren’t going to make any lasting impression on the people I love or the world at large. My preferences don’t come from inside of me but are ideas, fleeting and interchangeable, that exist outside of me. And, as _Why says, my preferences often work to separate me from others by creating unnecessary alliances and enemies.
This is perhaps best illustrated by taking a look at Facebook. The process of “liking” things on Facebook, whether it is a product page or a friend’s photo, is an exercise in self-fashioning through preferences. While I wasn’t able to articulate this very well when I wrote about leaving Facebook last month, I now have a very clear understanding of what bothered me about the time I spent on that site. I still have a Facebook account, but I only use it to post links to my blogs, and I don’t allow anyone’s posts to show in my news feed. I do care about my friends, but I want to know them in an authentic way and I can’t do that on Facebook. The time I used to spend mindlessly on Facebook I now spend working hard to create things — to self-fashion through what I do and make, and not what I like or dislike.
The same principle applies to the larger world. We are constantly being asked by advertisers, and especially political parties, to choose between one thing and another, or to choose one thing over many others. I think that is why it is so important to always remain open to all of the possibilities. My husband has always been so good at this, and I have learned so much from him. I used to think about things in a very binary way but from him I have learned to see that there is truly a spectrum of possibilities. In most situations it is best to be somewhere on the spectrum and not to dwell forever at one of the poles. Changing my mindset was a huge step toward being a more creative person, as I think it’s fair to say that creativity proliferates best in a malleable mind.
Being creative doesn’t necessarily mean “making art.” In fact, I’m not a very good artist (though I do like to doodle). Photography is a great medium for me because I am able to capture what I see in my mind without my hands getting in the way. And, of course, blogging is a huge creative outlet for me. I love writing posts and matching my ideas up with my photos to create an aesthetic experience for my readers. I homeschool my children and I spend a lot of time thinking creatively about how to help them learn, not to mention the creativity involved in the actual teaching experience. I think that you can find the spirit of creativity in the generation of just about anything. I’m not saying that everything is art, but I am saying that there are myriad ways to be creative.
While the things I create are not awe-inspiring (and are, in fact, quite humble), I’m not aiming to be the pinnacle of human achievement. I’d simply like to be a person defined by my ability and not my partiality.
*Why the Lucky Stiff, also known as _Why, is an artist and computer programmer. You can read more about him here, and read his book, Why’s (Poignant) Guide to Ruby, about the Ruby programming language here.
Latest posts by Kelli Ann Wilson (see all)
- our common hours - October 14, 2016
- september - October 1, 2016
- 28 // 52 - August 31, 2016
- in the woods // a happy childhood - August 30, 2016
- 25, 26, & 27 // 52 - August 30, 2016
Hello, Kelli.
I was looking up the definition of creativity, and I like that it says, “the ability to transcend traditional ideas,” as one of its meanings. I like that, it seems like it is saying the ability to think beyond what is in front of us. I think when we describe someone as creative, we do tend to relate it to the arts or some kind of manual creation, but it really does go far beyond that. It seems it is an approach to living rather than an ability to draw, crochet, design, etc. It’s more aligned with how we think, I guess? Being willing to look at other ways of doing something, other people’s points-of-view, rather than just holding our ground all of the time?
I loved what you said here: “Creativity proliferates best in a malleable mind.”
Author
Yes, I think that creativity is really about the generation of ideas, and from there the ideas may become something tangible or “knowable” in the real world, or they might just live in the mind forever. On my homeschooling blog I posted about some TED talks by Ken Robinson, a sort of “expert” on creativity. He talked quite a bit about the important link between creativity and innovation. I find that something always gets lost between the generation of ideas in my mind and the process of trying to bring them out into the world. I can never say, or capture, exactly what my mind is showing me. But, it’s worth the attempt, I think! You are certainly a very creative person — I think your comment did a better job of explaining my thoughts than my post did 🙂